GRE英語考試作文點評：滿分作文的解析

　　Issue 23

　　"Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem."

　　這個題目分析起來是說學術目的的。作為一個scholar/researcher應該考慮的是自己的感興趣的領域所在而不是考慮是不是他們的研究成果是對整個大社會大環境有貢獻的。這個題目第一眼看起來好象似乎是有理的，但是想到很多時候很多科學家的成果實際是無意義的。美國不是有一個搞笑諾貝爾獎嗎？就是獎勵類似的研究的。雖然也是科學成果但是根本就沒有實際操作的價值或者對人類或者對社會根本就沒有意義的。

　　但是這個contribution在某些時候也可以引申到名利方面。從這個方面來講，這個題目是可以成立的。

　　對這個題目進行進一步的分析，可以看出來題目里面有一個比較，非常明顯的比較，more來帶出來的，所以我們可以說這個speaker的觀點是很明顯的表明了自己是支持哪個方面的。

　　Should academic scholars and researchers be free to pursue whatever avenues of inquiry and research that interest them, no matter how unusual or idiosyncratic, as the speaker asserts? Or should they strive instead to focus on those areas that are most likely to benefit society?

　　拿問句來起頭，來質疑。脫離出了一般的解釋題目的開頭。雖然不是特別特別，但是還是讓人感覺比較的attractive。l strongly agree with the speaker, for three reasons.非常直白的陳述自己的觀點，同意speaker的觀點。

　　First of all,典型的連接詞，開始陳述觀點了。who is to decide which areas of academic inquiry are worth while?又是一個問句，但是這個問句的作用和開篇的問句不同了，是引出來自己論證的第一個方面。Scholars cannot be left to decide.自問自答。

　　Given a choice they will pursue their own idiosyncratic areas of interest, and it is highly unlikely that all scholars could reach a fully informed consensus as to what research areas would be most worthwhile. Nor can these decisions be left to regulators and legislators, who would bring to bear their own quirky notions about what would be worthwhile, and whose susceptibility to influence renders them untrustworthy in any event.

　　兩個否定句非常干凈利索的說出作者的看法，沒人有能力來決定什么是應該worth researching的。

　　Secondly, by human nature we are motivated to pursue those activities in which w

【GRE英語考試作文點評：滿分作文的解析】相關文章：

點評一篇GRE 作文習作05-04

新老GRE分數換算解析03-22

GRE考試作文點評：6分范文的構架05-04

GRE作文點評：高分作文的點睛之筆05-04

中考語文滿分作文及點評04-30

高考語文滿分作文及閱卷點評04-30

高考英語北京卷情景作文點評及詳細解析05-01

高中滿分作文及點評：閱讀與人生04-28

09屆高考語文滿分作文與失誤作文點評04-30

2008年海南省中考滿分作文及點評04-30